What are the levels of the Thompson PCs model?
“Thompson’s (2006) Personal, Cultural and Structural analysis (‘PCS Model’) does an excellent job of explaining how power relationships are expressed between individuals, groups and through the wider societal context and highlights the layered effect of oppression. Levels of the Thompson PCS Model (Thompson 2006)
Why is Thompson’s PCs model important for Social Work?
Thompson’s PCS model also effectively stresses the complex nature surrounding the issue of racism within society and social work. Thompson’s ‘P’ level suggests that “personal prejudices… manifests itself much more subtly and we are not likely to be aware of it unless or until we are confronted”.
Who is the creator of the PCs model?
The PCS model also highlights the layered effect of oppression on individuals (Pepper, 2012). The model was initially proposed by Neil Thompson in his book ‘Anti-Discriminatory Practice: Equality, Diversity and Social Justice’. It is said to have three interrelated level such as personal, cultural, and structural (Thompson, 2012).
What does the p stand for in the PCs model?
Define: The PCS model (Thompson 2001) has three concentric rings (inside to outside: P-C-S). The “P” stands for personal prejudice or the personal, psychological level; the “C” stands for the cultural level- consensus, commonality, conformity; the “S” level stands for the structural level.
How does Thompson’s PCs model help social workers?
Thompson’s PCS model is extremely useful in aiding social workers to accurately examine and understand the impact that oppression, discrimination and inequality has on the “social circumstances of clients” and on the “interactions between clients and the welfare state.” (Thompson, 2001) The first level of Thompson’s PCS model ‘P’ relates to the
What is the PCs model of power relationships?
“Thompson’s (2006) Personal, Cultural and Structural analysis (‘PCS Model’) does an excellent job of explaining how power relationships are expressed between individuals, groups and through the wider societal context and highlights the layered effect of oppression.