What is trinitarian validity?

The Trinitarian view of validity (namely content, criterion-related, and construct) has dominated psychology for almost a half century. Therefore, we review the evolution of the concept of validity in the psychology discipline, with a particular emphasis on industrial and personnel psychology.

What is a construct validity in research?

Construct validity is the extent to which the measure ‘behaves’ in a way consistent with theoretical hypotheses and represents how well scores on the instrument are indicative of the theoretical construct.

What is concept validity?

Nomological validity refers to the extent to which predictions based on the concept which an instrument purports to measure are confirmed (Cronbach and Meehl, 1955). Another study of opinion leadership illustrates this type of validation procedure.

What is the key concept of validity?

Validity refers to whether the number obtained truly reflects what the user intended to measure. Validity requires reliability. According to these authors, validity is not a property of the measure, but instead refers to the truthfulness of the inferences that are drawn from the measure.

What is construct validity in simple terms?

Construct validity defines how well a test or experiment measures up to its claims. It refers to whether the operational definition of a variable actually reflect the true theoretical meaning of a concept.

What is the difference between construct and content validity?

Construct validity means the test measures the skills/abilities that should be measured. Content validity means the test measures appropriate content.

What is the best definition of validity?

Validity is the quality of being correct or true. When a statement is true and has a lot of evidence backing it up, this is an example of a situation where the evidence supports the validity of the statement. noun.

What is content validity and examples?

the extent to which a test measures a representative sample of the subject matter or behavior under investigation. For example, if a test is designed to survey arithmetic skills at a third-grade level, content validity indicates how well it represents the range of arithmetic operations possible at that level.

What is the difference between content validity and construct validity?

How do you explain construct validity?

Construct validity refers to whether a scale or test measures the construct adequately. An example is a measurement of the human brain, such as intelligence, level of emotion, proficiency or ability.

What are the factors that affect validity?

Here are some factors which affect internal validity:

  • Subject variability.
  • Size of subject population.
  • Time given for the data collection or experimental treatment.
  • History.
  • Attrition.
  • Maturation.
  • Instrument/task sensitivity.

How does the Trinitarian view of validity work?

The Trinitarian view of validity is that evaluations of validity should focus on how well a measurement’s quantitative value represents the attribute being measured and how well the measurement gives scores relevant to what the test is trying to measure (Guion, 1980).

Are there Trinitarian doctrines in the Old Testament?

No trinitarian doctrine is explicitly taught in the Old Testament. Sophisticated trinitarians grant this, holding that the doctrine was revealed by God only later, in New Testament times (c.50–c.100) and/or in the Patristic era (c. 100–800).

Which is true about the doctrine of the Trinity?

Many Christian apologists argue that the doctrine of the Trinity is “biblical” (i.e. either it is implicitly taught there, or it is the best explanation of what is taught there) using three sorts of arguments. They begin by claiming that the Father of Jesus Christ is the one true God taught in the Old Testament.

Who was involved in the development of Trinitarian doctrines?

Many thinkers influential in the development of trinitarian doctrines were steeped in the thought not only of Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism, but also the Stoics, Aristotle, and other currents in Greek philosophy (Hanson 1988, 856–869).